Another administrative court of appeal, according to document No. 645/1095/25, was satisfied with the appeal scum, filed by lawyer Kerimov Alik Zamirovich, regarding the decision of TCC and SP about attracting a client to administrative function.
⚖️ One more step to justice at once from AB “Kerimov and Partners”!
📘 The court found that there was sufficient evidence to cancel or to cancel the subpoenas, the TCC authorities did not verify the fact of proper notification of the persons, and the clients’ actions had no signs offense, transferred Art. 210-1 KUPAP. In addition, the return of a postal item marked “weekday addressee” cannot be considered for confirmation of the click. The positive person himself speaks of the fact that there are daily notifications from postal service workers about the need to tear off the assigned sheet without tearing it off.
The furnishings are indicated, as a result of the lack of awareness of the individual about the guilt of the singerI can’t tell the language about the wisdom of such a thinglanguage.
Zgidno st. 62 of the Constitution of Ukraine, the guilt of an individual, who is attracted to the point of certainty, can be brought to light by reliable evidence, and not rely on assumptions, and there is no doubt that the guilt of an individual will be brought to light on its own merits.
The European Court of Human Rights, which made its decision on February 10, 1995. The law “Allen de Ribermont v. France” emphasizes that the scope of the principle of the presumption of innocence is significantly wider: criminal liability is not less for a criminal court, which is the main focus of the law on criminal liability accused, and for all other authorities of the state.
For the presence in the materials of the certificate of relevant, sufficient, reliable and admissible evidence that would confirm that the positive order was duly informed about the call to INFORMATION_6, the panel of judges It has come to the conclusion that the poser cannot do pull-ups to the level of strength in part 3 tbsp. 210-1 KUPAP.
In addition, the panel of judges respects that the date of appearance of the positive worker before the TCC and SP is designated by the summons (11/25/2024) and is identical to the date of failure of OSOBA_1, designated in the controversial ruling (11/20/2024).
The panel of judges respects the pardon of the court of the first instance due to possible technical errors in the date of failure of PERSONAL_1, specified in the resolution, the remainder of which contributes to the establishment of the circumstances of the offense.
💬 These decisions are a solid confirmation of established ship practice, for which
⚖️ formal, disrupted delivery procedures cannot be a basis for attracting communities to the level of supremacy.
📍 Lawyer Kerimov A.Z. Similar complaints have been filed more than once, and another appellate court consistently upholds the position of defense, deeming the actions of the TCC and SP bodies illegal.
✅ Professional leaders of the Law Office “Kerimov and Partners”
The rights of clients are constantly renewed, and illegal decisions of government authorities are limited.
📄 Sent for decisions: https://opendatabot.ua/court/130663290-6929596351d1e312c7cfa7a7b61e42b3
- Right No. 645/1095/25
📚 Law Firm “Kerimov and Partners” is an effective legal defender of the right, no matter how difficult it is.